Truth
and Liberty
-
Not Biblical Opposites
By
David R. Currie,
Executive Director
Recently
Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary,
in Louisville, gave the opening address at a conference titled,
"Southern Baptists in the New Millennium: Identity, Orthodoxy,
and Cooperation" (Baptist Press, March 22, 2001).
"The
SBC controversy is rooted in an argument over Baptist history
and what role that history should play in the modern church ...
The differing parties could be divided into two camps: the truth
party and the liberty party. The truth party emphasizes the authority
of Scripture and its inerrancy, while the liberty party focuses
on personal autonomy," Mohler claimed.
I
feel troubled by the statement because it does not seem consistent
with things I have read repeatedly in Holy Scripture. As I wrote
in another article (see pages 2-3) when one is looking for answers,
one should turn to God's written word. I could not find support
in the Bible for Mohler's statement. My Bible, as I interpret
it, said that truth and liberty were not opposites, but partners.
Biblically, both Jesus and Paul said that truth led to liberty.
The
scriptures speak of Jesus being the truth. John 1:14 says, "and
the word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his
glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full
of grace and truth."
Jesus
said he was the truth in John 14:6, "Jesus saith unto him,
I am the way, the truth and the life."
Then
Jesus said in John 16:13, "Howbeit, when he, the spirit of
truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth."
Then
Jesus equated truth and liberty in John 8:31-32 saying, "Then
said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue
in my word, then ye are my disciples indeed; And ye shall know
the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Jesus
seemed to say repeatedly that he and the Holy Spirit are ultimate
truth. Our relationship with the living truth will in turn lead
us into truth and liberty. Truth and liberty seemed to go hand-in-hand
in Jesus' mind.
Paul
seemed to believe like Jesus and did not see a problem with truth
and liberty. Paul cautioned the Galatians in very strong terms,
"I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called
you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really
not another, only there are some who are disturbing you, and want
to distort the gospel of Christ." (Gal.1:6-7)
Paul
said the Christ led to freedom and liberty, writing in Galatians
5:1, "It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore
keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery."
Paul
encouraged the Galatian Christians to disregard people that were
so convinced they knew the truth and therefore were "distorting
the Gospel." Following them would lead to slavery, not liberty.
Scripture
is clear that Jesus faced this accusation, being for liberty and
not truth. Matthew 12:1-2, says, "At that time, Jesus went
on the Sabbath through the grainfields, and His disciples became
hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat. But when
the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, "Behold, Your disciples
do what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath." In essence,
the Pharisees were accusing Jesus of ignoring truth and "doing
whatever he wanted."
This
happened more than once. Matthew 15: 1-3 says, "Then some
Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem, saying, "Why
do Your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For
they do not wash their hands when they eat bread." And He
answered and said to them, "And why do you yourselves transgress
the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?" Again,
Jesus was accused of valuing liberty over truth. Ultimately, the
Scriptures say, "they began to plot against him." Ultimately,
they killed him for his love of truth and liberty.
Church
history also is full of true stories of those who paid a price
for challenging the accepted truth and standing for real truth
and liberty. Roman Catholic authorities accusing Michael Sattler
of wanting too much freedom and not valuing truth burned him at
the stake in Rottenburg on May 20, 1527. They charged Sattler
with "acting contrary to the decree of the emperor, of teaching
and believing that the body and blood of Christ were not present
in his sacrament and that infant-baptism was not promotive of
salvation." Does anyone reading this disagree with Sattler?
I doubt it.
The
Inquisition was about protecting the truth from those who valued
liberty and treasured the freedom to interpret Scripture contrary
to the powers that are. Thank God Martin Luther challenged the
guardians of the truth and proclaimed that "the just shall
live by faith" as he read in Romans 1.
I
could go on and on citing Scripture and church history, but I
hope I have made my point. Real truth and liberty go hand and
hand. We discover truth when we allow liberty to flourish. We
must allow people to think for themselves and interpret Scripture
under the leadership of the Holy Spirit. Baptists exist because
of those who used their liberty to find new (but eternal) truth
in the Scripture contrary to the popular truth of the day.
Truth
leads to liberty, not slavery. It means freedom in Christ, which
in turn means being obedient to Scriptural truth instead of statements
of faith made up by people convinced they know the truth and others
do not.
Truth
without liberty is static, cold and mean. Liberty without truth
is license and therefore wild and undisciplined.
Nat
Tracy, my wonderful professor at Howard Payne, said, "True
freedom is glad obedience to authority." I believe he was
right. True freedom is obedience to the living Christ and his
written word. I will not be "subject again to a yoke of slavery"
to a creed written by Mohler or anyone else.
May 2001
|