Baptist
Press "Moves Away From Fairness"
By
Robert Parham,
executive director of the Baptist Center for Ethics.
Two news stories about
the death of a journalist illustrate competing approaches
to journalism |
The Baptist Press story about Al Shackleford's
death in a car accident gave two short sentences to the emotional
events surrounding his termination 10 years ago by the Southern
Baptist Convention's Executive Committee.
The Associated Baptist Press story
on Shackleford's death gave six paragraphs to his firing and that
of Dan Martin, another Baptist journalist.
Following a dispute with one of the SBC's leading
fundamentalists, Shackleford and Martin were fired without cause
in an unprecedented, closed-door meeting with armed guards. Shackleford
later worked as a clerk at a Kroger store, earning $4.60 an hour.
Associated Baptist Press' approach
showed its commitment to the time-honored standard of "tell the
truth and trust the people." Baptist Press, the SBC's official
news agency, demonstrated its commitment to glossing over information
unfavorable to Southern Baptist fundamentalism.
Never perfect, Baptist Press once strove
for balance and accuracy. BP has increasingly speeded away from
its historic commitment to fairness and truthfulness, becoming
a highly partisan publicity service.
Other stories illustrate BP's shading
of truthfulness and abandonment of fairness.
In April, BP issued a story with the
headline "SBC World Hunger Gifts: Second-Highest Total in '99."
The SBC official responsible for hunger-concerns
bragged, "God is working in marvelous ways to promote Southern
Baptists to give selflessly." He added, "The increased giving
reveals that more and more Southern Baptists are gaining a passion
for compassion regarding those who are less fortunate and hurting."
What the story failed to mention was that the
highest level of world hunger giving occurred in 1985, fifteen
years earlier. The story did not point out that the 1999 level
of giving was more than $1 million behind the all-time record.
One wonders about the reason for the omission
of relevant facts. Was it an effort to gloss over information
that did not reflect positively on current SBC leadership or that
would have reflected positively on moderate leadership in the
1980s?
Another BP story alleged that a
BP reporter was pushed and cursed at the Cooperative Baptist
Fellowship's 2000 General Assembly. The story provided no supporting
evidence for the reporter's charge. BP ignored the need
for an additional witness to verify the reporter's claim before
printing the story.
BP's plummeting standards raise questions
about journalistic integrity. It also forces the question of why
non-fundamentalist Baptist state convention papers continue to
use BP as a source for news stories.
September 2000
|