A FORMER MISSIONARY RESPONDS T0 CRITICISM
OF PARKS
By
Dean Dickens
A
response to Morris Chapman's statement about Keith Parks,
"Dr. Parks has a well-founded reputation
of being unpleasant in his dealings with people he disagrees
with, but in this case he is particularly intemperate
in his remarks. It is sad when anyone determines that
he can only build up his work by tearing down that of
others. Disgruntlement and bitterness spoil a man's
spirit, jade his judgment and sometimes warp his integrity."
Quote
from May 22 Baptist Press article. Chapman is president
of the SBC Executive Committee.
|
In reading that Dr. Keith Parks had agreed
to share with a Missouri group his insight and experience about
the SBC changes, I was both surprised and appreciative. Surprised
because, although Keith knows the inside story on the SBC takeover,
he usually speaks on the missionary passion that marks his life
and fires his passions.
While I was pleasantly surprised at his candid
and painful reflections on the "deceit . . . lying . . . (and)
cheating" in the SBC takeover, I was staggered and disappointed,
but not surprised at the response from Morris Chapman of the SBC
Executive Committee.
Nashville responses did not refute what Parks
said. Instead they shot the messenger. I have sat for two months
on my concerns about this attack yet still feel a need to respond
to Chapman's uncharitable and unbiblical remarks. Why?
First, if anyone in this world has a well-founded
reputation of being unpleasant in his dealings with people he
disagrees with, it is anyone except Keith Parks. Having known,
loved, and worked with him for 30 years, I have never heard of
him being unpleasant or ungentlemanly to anyone let alone being
bitter or disgruntled.
Those of us who know Keith know he is the consummate
Christian gentleman. Chapman's self-serving piety reminds one
of Ralph Waldo Emerson's words: "The more he talked of his honor,
the faster we counted our spoons."
Second, Chapman expressed dismay that Parks
would encourage people to support missions beyond the SBC Executive
Committee's definition of the Cooperative Program. A reviewing
of CP history reveals it initially used funds from people who
gave in other designated ways.
For Chapman to say Parks came to this conclusion
of giving outside the CP only after finding new employers is sad,
sadistic and scurrilous. Chapman knows that Parks no more looked
for new employers than did Larry Baker (Christian Life Commission),
Loyd Elder (Sunday School Board), Russell Dilday (Southwestern
Seminary), Milton Ferguson (Midwestern Seminary), Al Shackleford
and Dan Martin (Baptist Press) and others.
Parks delayed going with the fledgling CBF,
who simply wanted to have a real fellowship, be real Baptists
and cooperate in an ongoing worldwide missionary task.
Chapman used that same convoluted logic about
Parks having been hired and salaried through CP.
(1) Keith Parks has never been for hire. I
don't recall Chapman ever having been attracted by the fantastic
salary we Southern Baptist missionaries were privileged to receive.
We were grateful for the privilege of serving. We were appreciative
of support Southern Baptists offered. Chapman would do well to
revise his insulting secular thinking.
(2) That massive $20,000 annual field missionary
salary for which Keith Parks was "hired" comes nowhere close to
the huge salary Chapman and others at SBC seminaries and agencies
have negotiated.
(3) Many don't know that in Richmond and at
CBF, Parks fought against getting more than a field missionary's
salary.
Nashville often wails that "CBF mission giving
will cause our missionaries to be cut off and abandoned." What
SBC leaders don't want Baptist laymen to know is the International
Mission Board has on hand more than $350 million in Invested Funds
and an additional income of $215 million.
Reported investments incomes are $26 million.
Neither Parks nor anyone begrudges IMB having hundreds and hundreds
of millions of dollars invested beyond their regular budget funds.
We are glad. Let's not act as if CBF mission giving is going to
harm mission finances.
Parks, in his Missouri address, also noted
concern that SBC takeover methods were dishonest and unbiblical.
He quietly mentioned he was forced out of Foreign Mission Board
leadership. "Never one time did anyone try to accuse me of not
believing the Bible."
No, they did not and cannot. More important,
Parks obeyed the Bible. We need more of that today from New Boston
to Nashville.
If Nashville can't heed the Holy Bible they
told us they were anxious to defend, they might remember Russell
Lynes' worldly observation, "Cynicism is the intellectual cripple's
substitute for intelligence, the dishonest businessman's substitute
for conscience, the communicator's substitute, for self-respect."
Nashville's tune is a pathetic analysis.
September 2000
|