IS THE INTERPRETATION
OF SCRIPTURE AN ISSUE IN BAPTIST LIFE?
NOT FOR A FUNDAMENTALIST
By David R. Currie,
Coordinator
In
October, I read what I first thought was one of the most outlandish
and ridiculous statements made in the past 20 years of Baptist
controversy. Jimmy Draper, president of LifeWay Resources (the
Sunday School Board) said in response to some remarks by Bill
Moyers that "the priesthood of the believer, local church
autonomy and the interpretation of Scripture have never been an
issue in the last 20 years and Moyers knows it."
I
first thought, "how can he say such a thing?" Those
are exactly the issues to traditional Baptists, but not in his
mind or the mind of fundamentalists. Traditional fundamentalists
believe the Bible is God's word, but it must be interpreted and
applied. We believe people can interpret scripture differently.
Thus churches can worship differently and have different policies
on ordination while remaining faithful to the Bible as God's Holy
and authoritative word. We think that is the Baptist way and a
part of our heritage. History has shown that unity in diversity
is one of the secrets to Baptist success.
Apparently
for Draper and other fundamentalists, there is no such thing as
the priesthood of the believer, local church autonomy or the interpretation
of Scripture. There is only the Bible and the Bible says what
they say it says so there is no room for discussion. If you do
not agree with them, your problem is with the Apostle Paul or
whoever the Biblical writer was.
I
remember a discussion I had with a fundamentalist several years
ago. Several social issues came up and I said, "Are these
issues that should divide us? Can't we sit on the back porch and
drink a glass of tea and discuss them since we both believe in
Jesus?" The man shot back quickly, "No, you either believe
the Bible or you don't." I replied, "You mean I have
to agree with your interpretation on these issues," and he
quickly responded, "No, it is not a matter of interpretation.
You have to believe the Bible and if you don't believe the Bible
I do not want to have fellowship with you." It was a pointless
discussion that would never get anywhere because in his mind,
anyone who did not agree with him did not believe the Bible.
Draper
was expressing this attitude in his response to Moyers. Stan Coffee,
expresses this same attitude, "I cannot have fellowship with
those who do not believe the bible is the inerrant word of God,
... who believe it's OK to ordain women as ministers and deacons."
No issue exists over the priesthood of the believer, local church
autonomy or the interpretation of Scripture, according to them.
Fundamentalists believe their interpretation is exactly what the
Bible teaches and do not consider their viewpoint an interpretation.
They claim it is just what the Bible says. There are no such principles
like the priesthood of every believer or local church autonomy.
Everyone
who believes the Bible agrees and thinks alike. If they don't,
then someone doesn't believe the Bible and it is certainly not
the fundamentalist who knows exactly what the Bible says. If you
don't believe me, ask them. They will be happy to tell you in
no uncertain terms.
December 1999
|