Article Archive

"A Document of Exclusion"
by James R. Fuller,
Pastor, Calder Baptist Church, Beaumont, T
X

Just when I think that our national fundamentalist Southern Baptist leaders couldn't possibly think of anything crazier to do, they surprise me again! You have heard the news reports of the recently released document on which Southern Baptists will vote (and will likely approve) at our national convention in June. This document, called the "Baptist Faith and Message," originated in 1925 and was revised in 1963. (Somehow, we managed to survive as a denomination without any written statement of faith for three-quarters of a century).

The 1963 statement was revised by fundamentalist leaders in 1998 by the addition of the family amendment which said, in part, that "a wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ." The amendment failed to mention that Ephesians 5.21 says we all are to submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. We have lived with this narrow interpretation for two years.

News media understandably have reported only the most "newsworthy" (i.e., "what creates controversy and, therefore, sells") aspect of the new document. This addition states, "While both men and women are gifted for service in the church, the office of pastor is limited to men as qualified by scripture." (Article VI "The Church").

Scripture does indeed list the qualifications of men who would be overseers, or bishops in I Timothy 3.1-7. (The word pastor is only used once in the New Testament in Ephesians 4.11 as an expression of the grace of Christ given to some).

It also lists qualifications of deacons and deaconesses in the verses following. There is no statement in the New Testament which says, "Women cannot be pastors." Wisely until next month, Southern Baptists have chosen to remain silent on an issue which scripture does not address, deferring its resolution to each local congregation. That day ends next month.

The 2000 document will become known as a statement which excluded women as pastors, but the document will rewrite our history because it excludes other statements we have held dear.

The revisionists exclude from the preface the sentence, "Baptists emphasize the soul's competency before God, freedom in religion, and the priesthood of the believer." One wonders how one can be Baptist without such distinctive beliefs.

The revisionists exclude from the first sentence of "Article I: The Scriptures," the words, "the record of." The sentence previously read, "The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is the record of God's revelation of Himself to man." Take away those three words and we come closer to worshipping the Bible rather than the God to whom the Bible points us. Scripture is holy and points us to God, but scripture is not God.

The revisionists exclude the last sentence of the first article, "The criterion by which the Bible is to be interpreted is Jesus Christ." Since 1963, this sentence has allowed intelligent, thoughtful analysis of biblical passages which are antithetical to the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. Many Old Testament passages fall into this category. Such passages, when compared with the criterion of Jesus Christ, fail to have compelling merit for us. No longer!

The revisionists exclude the word "inerrant" from consideration as the Executive Director of the Baptist General Convention of Texas had requested. Instead they used the odd phrase in Article One, "...all scripture is totally true (italics mine) and trustworthy."

If all scripture is "totally true," then we must believe it is true in all matters of science. Archaeology and the advances of science during the last 100 years prove us wrongheaded to keep trying to assert something which the Bible does not claim for itself.

There are more gems which can be mined from this new revision of our faith and message. Our history continues to be rewritten as a people and a faith of exclusion. I hope we survive long enough for the pendulum to swing back to the center of the theological spectrum where most Southern Baptists still long to reside. Thank goodness that Texas Baptists continue to demonstrate a more accurate reflection of the people called Baptists. May our tribe increase!

July 2000